🔗 Share this article Relatives' Distress Over Shoreline Degradation Endangering Norfolk Burial Sites Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones. An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations. A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward. “Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.” Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said. Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard. “You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.” “I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.” A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved. “It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.” She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.” Seeking Solutions and Certainty An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious. Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near. “It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.” A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.” It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.” “There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.” The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.